Legal Opinion
Hennessey v. Fein
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 14, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYAN, District Judge.
Application is now made by Buchman and Buchman, attorneys for defendant Fein, for an order under Sec. 63 et seq. N.Y.Gen.Corp.Law, requiring the corporate defendant Lanston Industries, Inc., to pay the sum of $13,750 for legal services rendered to defendant Fein in this suit filed under Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S. C.A. § 78p.
The corporate defendant opposes the application urging among various grounds the inapplicability of Article 6-A (Sec. 63 et seq.) of the N.Y.Gen. Corp.Law to a suit filed under Sec. 16(b). Because we agree it is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Board of Comm'rs of Jackson Cty. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Smolowe v. Delendo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Austrian v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Buchman & Buchman v. Lanston Industries, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1960
- Lewis v. L. B. Nelson Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980