Legal Opinion

Buchman & Buchman v. Lanston Industries, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

This is a proceeding brought, pursuant to sections 63 et seg. of the General Corporation Law, for the assessment of the expense of attorney’s fees incurred in the successful defense of a derivative stockholder’s suit.

It appears that one Bernard Fein was the principal officer and a director of Lanston Industries, Inc. A stockholder’s derivative action was instituted in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York by one Hennessey, suing in the name and on behalf of Lanston, against Fein and others, individually and as directors. The action was based upon subdivision…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hennessey v. FeinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  2. Kunath v. BremerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sorin v. Shahmoon Industries, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API