Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Quier

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 10, 1987No. 2847PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s Post-Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA) 1 petition following his guilty plea to third-degree murder, robbery and conspiracy. Appellant claims that trial counsel was ineffective: (1) for failing to advise him of the right to appeal the trial court’s “implicit denial” of his motion in arrest of judgment and for failing to effect such an appeal; and (2) for failing to pursue appellant’s petition for reconsideration of sentence and for failing to advise appellant of his right to appeal the sentence imposed by the trial court.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. MirandaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. ChenetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MouzonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. KeysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. GrabowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Com. v. Ahiem, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Com. v. Bishop, H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API