Legal Opinion
Brighton Village Associates v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 16, 1994No. 91-1252CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FUTEY, Judge.
This case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs contend that the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has breached a contract to provide housing subsidies to plaintiffs in connection with their purchase of a HUD housing project. Defendant replies that HUD has complied with the contract and that several of the years in issue are barred by the statute of limitations. Defendant also asserts that several parties to this suit are not proper parties and should be dismissed.
Factual Background
Brighton Village Associates (BVA), a…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brighton Village Associates, Herbert F. Gold, Juan M. Cofield, James E. Cofield, Jr., Trustee, and Herbert F. Gold, Trustee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Inter-Coastal Xpress, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Wrona v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Teitelbaum v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1996
- Deponte Investments, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.