Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 1, 2020No. 3:19-cv-03310Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JANE DOE, Case No. 19-cv-03310-JSC 10 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 11 v. TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 12 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 33 Defendants. 13 14 15 Jane Doe brings tort claims against Uber and its wholly owned subsidiaries Rasier, LLC 16 and Rasier CA, LLC (collectively “Uber”) after she was assaulted by a former Uber driver 17 posing as a current Uber driver. The Court previously dismissed Plaintiff’s claims with leave to 18 amend. (Dkt. No. 29.) Uber now moves to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Lisa M. v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Lugtu v. California Highway PatrolCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Van't Rood v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API