Legal Opinion

James v. Uber Technologies Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 10, 2022No. 3:19-cv-06462Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHRISTOPHER JAMES, et al., Case No. 19-cv-06462-EMC 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 9 v. REQUEST FOR AN APPEAL BOND 10 UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC., Docket No. 233 11 Defendant. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiffs ask the Court to impose an appeal bond should S. Patrick Mendel, a settlement 15 class member who is proceeding pro se, wish to pursue his objections on appeal. See Docket No. 16 207 (Plaintiffs’ Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement, or “Mot.”) at 20 & 20 n.13; 17 Docket No. 239 (“Plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Azizian v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Overton v. Uber Techs., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API