Legal Opinion

State v. Adams

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 12, 2000No. 1 CA-CR 98-0528PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GERBER, Judge.

¶ 1 Does a criminal defendant whose business premises are subjected to a lawful search pursuant to a warrant, have a reasonable expectation of privacy in a personal residence unlawfully maintained on the same property? Because we conclude that this defendant did enjoy an expectation of personal privacy beyond the commercial enterprise, we affirm the trial court’s order suppressing the evidence seized from the residence.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

THE FIRST SEARCH

¶ 2 On June 26, 1997, undercover officers with the Mesa Police Department attended a performance by the band…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Whiting v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. State v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  3. State v. BlackmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  4. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. State v. PeltzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API