State v. Stockton
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MALLARD, Chief Judge.
The defendant was not present at the trial after the first State’s witness was examined and cross-examined. Nor was he present when the verdict was rendered. Insofar as this record reveals, he is not at this time at a place where the superior court may exercise its jurisdiction over him personally by imposing a proper judgment on the verdict. The question, therefore, could be but has not been raised as to whether the defendant, by fleeing the jurisdiction of the court, has forfeited his right to appeal. See State v. Keebler, 145 N.C. 560, 59 S.E. 872 (1907). However,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Parker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- State v. . VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. WhittedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.