Legal Opinion
Scarborough v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
Decided August 22, 2001No. 10-99-206-CRPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIS, Chief Justice.
A jury convicted Eric Scarborough of possession of a deadly weapon in a penal institution. The court assessed punishment at five years’ imprisonment. Scarborough claims in two points that the court erred by: (1) denying his motion to disqualify the attorney pro tem; and (2) sentencing him without a presentence investigation (PSI) report.
ATTORNEY PRO TEM
Scarborough’s first point challenges the court’s denial of his motion to disqualify the attorney pro tem. The State responds that no error occurred because any conflict of interest which may exist in this case does…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Fowler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Whitelaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Stephens v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Marbut v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2002
- Goodman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
- Archie Glenn Crawford v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2025
- Benny Cavazos Valverde v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
- Derek McKay Davidson v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2021
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.