Lana A. v. Woodburn
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KESSLER, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Petitioners challenge the juvenile court’s orders subjecting them to detention pending disposition on their probation revocation hearings in these consolidated petitions for special action. Petitioners argue they cannot be subject to detention because they were adjudicated incorrigible without the benefit of counsel. We filed an order accepting jurisdiction and stating that a written decision would follow. This is that decision. For the reasons stated below, we hold that Petitioners were detained in error and cannot be subject to further detention based on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Alabama v. SheltonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 2 v. Phoenix Employee Relations BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Haas v. ColosiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Slade v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Prutch v. Town of QuartzsiteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Kondaur Capital Corp. v. Pinal CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Stop Exploiting Taxpayers v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005