Legal Opinion
Brown v. De Filippis
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 11, 1989No. 87 Civ. 3498 (RWS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff pro se John Brown (“Brown”), proceeding in forma pauperis, moved the court on March 14, 1989 and on March 18, 1989, pursuant to Rules 45(c) and (d), Fed. R.Civ.P. and 28 U.S.C. § 1825, to allow service of a deposition subpoena by the United States Marshal to compel the depositions of attorney Thomas J. Marlow (“Marlow”) and defendant Bobby Carter (“Carter”). The deposition was to take place March 28,1989. Brown has moved to dispense with the payment of a security prior to bringing the action and to waive deposition expenses. No opposition papers have…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Flint v. HaynesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- William McNeil v. Mary A. LowneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Willard E. Johnson v. Ronald Hubbard, Lewis Lindner, Kahlil MatoukCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Paul N. Papas v. Margaret HanlonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Marks v. CalendineDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fridman v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Gonzalez v. FennerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Cordaro v. Department of DefenseDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2024
- Mayanduenas v. BigelowDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2024