Fisher v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Per curiam
Gregory Fisher, by his attorney, iam. Waldman, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. This court has held that we will grant a motion for rule on the clerk when the attorney admits that the record was not timely filed due to an error on his part. See, e.g., Terry v. State, 288 Ark. 172, 702 S.W.2d 804 (1986). Here, the attorney does not admit fault on his part. We have held that a statement that it was someone else’s fault or no one’s fault will not suffice. Clark v. State, 289 Ark. 382, 711 S.W.2d 162 (1986). Therefore, appellant’s motion must be denied.
The appellant’s attorney shall file…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tarry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
3Cited by2 opinions
- McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- McKenzie v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003