Legal Opinion

Tarry v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 3, 1986PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Timmy Tarry, by his attorney, Gene Worsham, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and appellant’s attorney accepts full responsibility for not perfecting the appeal on time.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Purtle, J., not participating.

2Cited by62 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Beavers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Brazil v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API