Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance Co. v. Louis Marx & Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1980No. 80-369PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

Exclusion (k), known in the insurance community as a “business risk” exclusion, contains essentially three provisos. In order for liability for bodily injury or property damage to be excluded from coverage under Continental’s policy, the following conditions must all occur:(1) the injury or damage must result from the failure of the insured’s product to perform the function or serve the purpose intended by the insured;(2) such failure must be due to a mistake or deficiency in design or design-related areas; and(3) the injury or damage must not result from active malfunctioning of the product.

H…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arcos Corporation v. American Mutual Liability Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Cargill, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1979
  3. American Employers' Insurance Company and Bowerman Brothers, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Pure Tech Systems, Inc. v. Mt. Hawley InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. St. Marys Foundry, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  3. Retail Ventures, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  4. Neal-Pettit v. LahmanOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Bondex International, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API