Legal Opinion

Piper v. Harnischfeger Corp.

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided January 17, 1997No. CV-N-96-272-HDM (RAM)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

McQUAID, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiffs have moved for Court Directive Regarding Disclosure of Expert Testimony (Doc. # 17). Defendant has filed a response (Doc. # 21). The disagreement between the parties is in the nature of a discovery dispute concerning the interpretation of Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2)(B). On January 14, 1997, the District Court referred the resolution of all discovery issues to the undersigned (Doc. # 25).

The issue before the court is whether or not a treating physician is subject to the requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2)(B) which provides that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wreath v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995
  2. Salas v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1995
  3. Baker v. Taco Bell Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1995
  4. Mangla v. University of RochesterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1996
  5. Bucher v. Gainey Transportation Service of Indiana, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1996

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Glock, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1997
  2. Sprague v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998
  3. Elgas v. Colorado Belle Corp.District Court, D. Nevada · 1998
  4. Shapardon v. West Beach EstatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1997
  5. McCloughan v. City of SpringfieldDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API