Piper v. Harnischfeger Corp.
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
McQUAID, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs have moved for Court Directive Regarding Disclosure of Expert Testimony (Doc. # 17). Defendant has filed a response (Doc. # 21). The disagreement between the parties is in the nature of a discovery dispute concerning the interpretation of Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2)(B). On January 14, 1997, the District Court referred the resolution of all discovery issues to the undersigned (Doc. # 25).
The issue before the court is whether or not a treating physician is subject to the requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2)(B) which provides that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wreath v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- Salas v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1995
- Baker v. Taco Bell Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1995
- Mangla v. University of RochesterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1996
- Bucher v. Gainey Transportation Service of Indiana, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
3Cited by17 opinions
- Sullivan v. Glock, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1997
- Sprague v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998
- Elgas v. Colorado Belle Corp.District Court, D. Nevada · 1998
- Shapardon v. West Beach EstatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1997
- McCloughan v. City of SpringfieldDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.