Legal Opinion
Railway Labor Executives Ass'n v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 23, 1970No. 23908PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
Appellant railway employees seek damages for loss of work resulting from the discontinuance of four interstate trains by their employer. They allege that the discontinuance did not comply with the procedures set out in Section 13a of the Interstate Commerce Act, 72 Stat. 571 *996(1958), 49 U.S.C. § 13a (1964).1 Without determining its lawfulness, we affirm the judgment of the district court, holding that this dispute between the railroad and its employees is properly cognizable by the National Railroad Adjustment Board under provisions of the Railway Labor Act, 45…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Transportation-Communication Employees Union v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Order of Railway Conductors of America v. PitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Gunther v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Railway Labor Executives Association v. Norfolk and Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Luck v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- James W. Leu, Individually and as Representative of a Class v. Norfolk & Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Robert E. Minehart v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.