Legal Opinion

Parker v. American Family Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 23, 1998No. 3— 97—0534PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breslin

The issue before the court is whether an insurance- policy’s underinsured motorist arbitration provision is contrary to public policy if it permits a trial de novo for awards in excess of the minimum liability set forth in the Illinois Safety and Family Financial Responsibility Law (625 ILCS 5/7 — 100 et seq. (West 1996)). The trial court concluded that such a structure is contrary to public policy and entered a judgment confirming an arbitration panel’s award in favor of the insured, Dennis Parker. Defendant American Family Insurance Company (American Family) appeals. We affirm.

FACTS

Parker…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. MarshOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Roe v. Amica Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Cohen v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  4. Kostakos v. KSN Joint Venture No. 1Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. Schmidt v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kost v. Farmers Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  2. Kost v. Farmers Automobile Insurance Ass'n.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. Parker v. American Family InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API