Parker v. American Family Insurance
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breslin
The issue before the court is whether an insurance- policy’s underinsured motorist arbitration provision is contrary to public policy if it permits a trial de novo for awards in excess of the minimum liability set forth in the Illinois Safety and Family Financial Responsibility Law (625 ILCS 5/7 — 100 et seq. (West 1996)). The trial court concluded that such a structure is contrary to public policy and entered a judgment confirming an arbitration panel’s award in favor of the insured, Dennis Parker. Defendant American Family Insurance Company (American Family) appeals. We affirm.
FACTS
Parker…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. MarshOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Roe v. Amica Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Cohen v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Kostakos v. KSN Joint Venture No. 1Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Schmidt v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kost v. Farmers Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Kost v. Farmers Automobile Insurance Ass'n.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Parker v. American Family InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998