Legal Opinion
United States v. Wade
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 24, 2000No. Crim.96-472 RCLPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
Pending are third-party intervenors Sheila Gant’s, and Shelton, Angel, Jean, and Dorothy Wade’s Petition for Payment of Attorney’s Fees and Expenses pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) of the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) and the Hyde Amendment, Pub.L. No. 105-119, 111 Stat. 2440, 2519 (1997), to which the Government has filed its Response in Opposition. Having carefully considered the parties’ written arguments, the supporting documentation before the Court, and the record herein, the Court will deny petitioners’ request for attorney’s fees and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ruckelshaus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- McMahon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Robert E. Douglas, Jr., Noel Lussier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Wade, SheltonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- United States v. GladstoneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Masterson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2002
- United States v. CampbellDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2001