United States v. Gladstone
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
OWEN, District Judge.
Defendant Richard Gladstone was acquitted following a four week trial before me for securities fraud and two and one-half days of jury deliberation. He now moves for attorney’s fees and expenses pursuant to the Hyde Amendment, 1 asserting he meets its requirement of showing that the prosecution of him was “vexatious, frivolous ... or [in] bad faith.”
In June 2000, a Grand Jury had indicted him and three others, Howard Helfant, Gus (“Tommy”) Geldman and Robert Wade, charging violations of the federal securities laws, and specifically that Gladstone owned and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. BunnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. HollandDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee v. Ranger Electronic Communications, Inc., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. GardnerDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. United States Currency in Sum of Six Hundred Sixty Thousand, Two Hundred Dollars ($660,200.00)District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Masterson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2002