Legal Opinion

United States v. Campbell

District Court, C.D. California

Decided February 15, 2001No. CR 98-269 CBMPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S OMNIBUS MOTIONS

CONSUELO BLAND MARSHALL, District Judge.

The matter before the Court, the Honorable Consuelo B. Marshall, United States District Judge presiding, is Defendant Brian Campbell’s Omnibus Motion for: 1) Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Hyde Amendment; 2) Dismissal of Indictment; 3) Grand Jury Transcripts, Notes, Logbooks and Minutes; 4) Bill of Particulars; 5) Permitting Defendant to Inspect, Copy or Photograph Certain Books and Documents; 6) Granting Defendant Any and All Exculpatory Information Relevant for an Evidentiary Hearing; and 7) for Sanctions Against…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States of America v. James Truesdale Ronald HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. BunnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Erik LindbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API