Legal Opinion

Whistler v. Cole

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1913PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Action for an injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Kirk, J.

In and prior to April, 1911, Elizabeth P. Ladow owned two adjoining lots on Main street in the village of Mechanicville, N. T. Under date of April 28, 1911, she conveyed to plaintiffs one of said lots by a deed which contained this covenant, “ The party of *520the first part for herself, her heirs and assigns, covenants and agrees to and with the parties of the second part, their heirs and assigns, that there shall not hereafter be built or erected on the lot of land now owned by the party of the first part, lying northerly of the premises hereby conveyed and extending therefrom to Underwood…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Post v. . WeilNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Cambridge Valley Bank v. . DelanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Davis v. McCarthyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hancock v. GummSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  2. Ladner v. SiegelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. National Bank of Newberry v. LivingstonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  4. Whisler v. ColeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  5. Polhamus v. HinesNew York Supreme Court · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API