Legal Opinion

Ladner v. Siegel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1928No. Appeal, 264PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

Siegel, one of the defendants, in 1917, acquired from the Drexel Estate eleven separate though contiguous lots of ground, largely undeveloped, divided into sections by opened and unopened streets marked on the Philadelphia city plan. A subdivision was made of some of the blocks, and properties were acquired by the plaintiffs in this proceeding in that section comprised within the four rectangles bounded by 46th and 47th Streets, Spruce Street and Osage Avenue, and part of one adjoining to the west. The lots marked thereon were sold for residential purposes, and in…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Korn v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Sanborn v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Commonwealth v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  4. Landell v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  5. Bacon v. SandbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McWilliams v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Ladner v. SiegelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Price v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Horace Case v. Arthur E. MorrisetteCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  5. Baederwood, Inc. v. MoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API