Legal Opinion

Rice v. Kringler

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 21, 1994No. C2-93-2512PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Appellants Joline Kringler and Carol Mus-selman seek review of the trial court’s order awarding respondents double the cost of replacing one-half of a partition fence. Appellants contend: (1) Minn.Stat. § 344.03 (1990) applies only when adjoining land of both of the owners is used and improved; and (2) the trial court erred in finding that appellants were provided with sufficient notice as required by Minn.Stat. § 344.04 (1990).

FACTS

Appellants own property directly north of property formerly owned by Hugh Rice and respondent Lois Rice. For the past ten years the Rices…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. McClay v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Miles v. AlthoffCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Brom v. KalmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lanpher v. NygardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API