Rice v. Kringler
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellants Joline Kringler and Carol Mus-selman seek review of the trial court’s order awarding respondents double the cost of replacing one-half of a partition fence. Appellants contend: (1) Minn.Stat. § 344.03 (1990) applies only when adjoining land of both of the owners is used and improved; and (2) the trial court erred in finding that appellants were provided with sufficient notice as required by Minn.Stat. § 344.04 (1990).
FACTS
Appellants own property directly north of property formerly owned by Hugh Rice and respondent Lois Rice. For the past ten years the Rices…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- McClay v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Miles v. AlthoffCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Brom v. KalmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lanpher v. NygardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013