Miles v. Althoff
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Respondents brought this action to obtain compensation for erection of a partition fence. Fence viewers had ordered appellant to erect the fence, and he failed to do so. Appellant claimed that he had not received notice of a fence examination by town viewers. The trial court held that there was substantial compliance with the notice requirement, and ordered judgment for respondents. We reverse.
FACTS
Appellant and respondents own property in Crow Wing County, with a common boundary line. Respondent Miles was dissatisfied with the upkeep of that portion of the boundary line…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Minneapolis v. WurteleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- McClay v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Pickerell v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Davis v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rice v. KringlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Commonwealth Capital Corp. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Lanpher v. NygardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Miles v. AlthoffCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985