Legal Opinion

Brom v. Kalmes

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 23, 1975No. 45078PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice. *

Appeal from a judgment of the Winona County District Court in an action arising out of a line fence dispute. Appellant sued to collect a sum awarded by the fence viewers; 1 respondent counterclaimed for trespass and destruction of trees on his property. The jury returned a verdict in respondent’s favor and the court ordered judgment accordingly. After denial of the usual blended motions, this appeal was taken.

The parties own adjoining land in Norton Township, Winona County. It does not appear from the record that, prior to appellant’s effort to fence his property, either…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meixner v. BueckslerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Boenig v. HornbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Muhl v. BohiCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  2. Rice v. KringlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Lanpher v. NygardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API