Legal Opinion

Rig Masters, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 24, 1998No. 97-19CPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

This action arises out of a contract between Rig Masters, Inc., and the Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”). Rig Masters was to inspect, operate, maintain, and repair several facilities owned by the Corps. In this suit, the contractor seeks recovery for a value engineering change proposal (“VECP”) it alleges the Corps accepted and from which the Corps derived benefits. Pending is defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or in the alternative, for summary judgment. In its motion to dismiss, defendant argues that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Dixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. James M. Ellett Construction Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. RCS Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  2. Vanalco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  3. Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  4. American Renovation & Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  5. Jordan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API