Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. Jenkins

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 9, 1920No. 1820PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Alimony. Before Judge Gower. Ben Hill superior court. November 22, 1919.

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

“ It is a well-established rule of practice that a ground of a

motion for new trial based upon the admission of evidence should state the objection made to the evidence, and that such objection was urged at the time the objection was made; otherwise no question is raised for determination.” City of Rome v. McWilliams, 145 Ga. 191 (88 S. E. 931).

2. Movant complains that the court erred in sustaining the objections of plaintiff’s counsel and refusing to allow the plaintiff to answer the following question: “You don’t want any alimony, do you? ” This ground of the motion is incomplete, because it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Rome v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Herndon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Sims v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  4. Crosby v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  5. Trussell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API