Legal Opinion

City of Rome v. McWilliams

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 11, 1916PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Action for damages. Before Judge Wright. Floyd superior court. March 25, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, P. J.

1. The nature of the ease fully appears from previous reports of it in 138 Ga. 581 (75 S. E. 645), and 142 Ga. 848 (83 S. E. 945). The evidence authorized the verdict.

2. It is a well-established rule of practice that a ground of a motion for new trial based upon the admission of evidence should state the objection made to the evidence, and that such objection was urged at the time the objection was made; otherwise no question is raised for determination. Hill v. Chastain, 138 Ga. 750 (75 S. E. 1130) ; Dunn v. Evans, 139 Ga. 741 (3), 742 ( 78 S. E. 122); Chambers v. State, 141 Ga. 652 (81 S.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dunn v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  2. Hill v. ChastainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Coffee v. DunaganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  4. Georgia & Florida Railway Co. v. StapletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  5. Chambers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Scarboro v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  2. Jenkins v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  3. Manning v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  4. Cathey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  5. Brown v. CarakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API