Legal Opinion

Allen v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 7, 1902No. 2361PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Ho statement necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of forgery, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

The indictment charges appellant with forging the following instrument, to wit: “Mr. George Eslaps Please pay this boy $3.00 Dollars for me T. W. WOOrd.” It further charges, that by the name “Mr. George Eslaps,” to whom said instrument was directed, was meant and intended Mr. George Islieb; and that by the expression, “this' boy,” to whom the instrument was made payable, was meant and intended that the same should be paid to Wesley Allen, etc. That the name…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crawford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jiminez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Bunker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1962
  5. Barber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API