Bunker v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Appellant was convicted, under the fourth count in the indictment, charging passing a forged instrument.
One of the main contentions of appellant is that the instrument alleged can not be made the predicate for a charge of forgery, and owing to his insistence we will discuss the question at length and the authorities cited by him. The evidence would authorize a finding that appellant purchased from Mr. Bishop in March, 1912, several head of cattle, and on the 13th day of March, 1912, gave him a check for fifty dollars in payment of the cattle, the said check reading:
"Guaranty Fund Bank Claude,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Crawford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892
- Cheatham v. RiddleTexas Supreme Court · 1852
- Reed v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
- Mays v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1854
- Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Christison v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960
- Rivas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Christison v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports2007