Legal Opinion

Bunker v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 12, 1915No. 3518PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant was convicted, under the fourth count in the indictment, charging passing a forged instrument.

One of the main contentions of appellant is that the instrument alleged can not be made the predicate for a charge of forgery, and owing to his insistence we will discuss the question at length and the authorities cited by him. The evidence would authorize a finding that appellant purchased from Mr. Bishop in March, 1912, several head of cattle, and on the 13th day of March, 1912, gave him a check for fifty dollars in payment of the cattle, the said check reading:

"Guaranty Fund Bank Claude,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Crawford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892
  2. Cheatham v. RiddleTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  3. Reed v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Mays v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  5. Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Christison v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Rivas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
  3. Christison v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API