Legal Opinion

Illinois Migrant Council, Inc. v. United States Department of Labor

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 20, 1985No. 84-2448PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUER, Circuit Judge.

This case is before us on a petition for review of a final decision of the Secretary of Labor. A Department of Labor Grant Officer disallowed $12,487 in CETA program costs incurred by the petitioner, the Illinois Migrant Council, Inc. An administrative law judge affirmed the Grant Officer’s decision. Petitioner appeals, contending that the Grant Officer’s decision is invalid and his order for repayment of the disallowed costs is unenforceable. We reject petitioner’s arguments and affirm the decision of the administrative law judge. 1

I

The Illinois Migrant Council, Inc.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. St. Regis Mohawk Tribe, New York v. William E. Brock, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  4. Milwaukee County, Wisconsin v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of the United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. City of Oakland, a Municipal Corporation v. Secretary Raymond Donovan, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Camden, New Jersey v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. In Re JacksonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1991
  3. The Blackfeet Tribe v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. In the Matter of City of St. Louis, Missouri v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  5. Colorado Department of Labor and Employment v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API