Legal Opinion
City of Camden, New Jersey v. United States Department of Labor
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 22, 1987No. 86-3729PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
In this case involving the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (CETA), the City of Camden, New Jersey, petitions us to set aside the Secretary of Labor’s order requiring the City to repay certain misspent federal funds. We will deny the City’s petition.
I
The petition involves Camden’s CETA hiring during 1974 and 1975. At all times relevant here, the City was a prime sponsor under a CETA grant administered by the Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration. Beginning in January 1975, the Department’s New York Associate Regional…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brock v. Pierce CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bennett v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Austin v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bennett v. Kentucky Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Cyberworld Enterprise Technologies, Inc. v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- City of Newark, New Jersey v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Kinion v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Colorado Department of Labor and Employment v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.