Legal Opinion

Owens v. . Holland Purchase Ins. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1874PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Upon the facts, as found by the referee, the judgment is correct. In such a case, after the affirmance of the judgment by the General Term, the only questions open for review, other than those arising upon exceptions taken to the rulings of the referee during the trial, are, whether the referee has found any fact, in the absence of any evidence tending to sustain it, or refused to find any material fact which was conclusively proved.

In this case, the policy…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rowley v. . the Empire Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1867
  2. Plumb v. . Cattaraugus Co. Mutual Insurance Company.New York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Jennings v. Chenango Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  4. Ripley v. . the &198tna Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1864
  5. Chaffee v. . Cattaraugus County Mutual Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Rohrbach v. . Germania Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Alexander v. . Germania Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Boetcher v. Hawkeye InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  4. Williams v. Pacific States Fire Ins. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Torbett v. GodwinNew York Supreme Court · 1891

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API