Legal Opinion

State v. Ashland

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 24, 2010No. A08-1630PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILDEA, Justice.

This appeal arises from a district court’s denial of Howe Bonding’s petition for reinstatement and discharge of a forfeited $10,000 bail bond. At issue is whether the district court erroneously applied the Shet-sky factors — the test we articulated for determining whether a forfeited bond should be reinstated. See In re Shetsky, 239 Minn. 463, 471, 60 N.W.2d 40, 46 (1953). Because we conclude that the district court erred, we reverse and remand with instructions.

Timothy Askland, charged with two counts of felony failure to pay child support, failed to appear at his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re ShetskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. State v. StorkampSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Almor Corp. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. LankowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. State v. AsklandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API