Legal Opinion

Smith v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 25, 1978No. 12173, 12426PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Per curiam

This case arose from the abduction and rape of a young woman on the morning of January 23, 1976. As she left her apartment to catch a bus to work, two men forced her into a car and drove to the Kenilworth Landfill where both of the men raped her at gunpoint and took forty cents from her purse. Subsequently, both appellants were found guilty by a jury of armed kidnaping, 1 armed rape, 2 armed robbery, 3 and carrying a pistol without a license. 4 On appeal, appellant Smith alleges that the trial court committed reversible error (1) in excluding expert testimony on the psychological principles…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Salen v. United States Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Jenkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. People v. EnisIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Middleton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Khaalis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Winestock v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API