Legal Opinion
Combs v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 18, 1897No. Nos. 10,684—(85)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Appeal by defendants from a judgment of tbe municipal court of Minneapolis in favor of plaintiff for $156.58, entered pursuant to findings by Holt, J.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This action was brought on a bond executed to the city of Minneapolis by defendant Jackson, as principal, and the defendant company, as surety, pursuant to the provisions of Laws 1895, c. 854, and as part of, and auxiliary to, a contract entered into by Jackson with the city to pave a part of Western avenue.
The material provisions of the statute are that the bond to be given by the contractor in such cases shall be—
“For the use of all persons who may perform any work or labor or furnish any skill or material in the execution of such contract, conditioned to pay as they become due all just…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Fay v. Bankers Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- American Druggists Insurance v. Thompson Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Weyerhaeuser Company v. Twin City Millwork Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Fairmont Cement Stone Manufacturing Co. v. DavisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Gelin v. HollisterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.