Legal Opinion
Weyerhaeuser Company v. Twin City Millwork Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 15, 1971No. 42671PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Otis, Justice.
Plaintiff, Weyerhaeuser Company, has sued and recovered against the prime contractor and its surety on a contractor’s bond for millwork which it furnished in the construction of an addition to a building on the University of Minnesota campus. The principal issue is Whether the record permits a finding that Twin City Millwork Company, with whom plaintiff contracted, was a subcontractor under the prime contractor, Watson Construction Company, or was simply a materialman. We have concluded that the trial court was justified in finding that Twin City Millwork Company was a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Clifford F. MacEvoy Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Calvin Tomkins Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States Ex Rel. Hill v. American Surety Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Mankin v. United States Ex Rel. Ludowici-Celadon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Theisen v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Gibson Steel Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Wanzek Construction, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- American Druggists Insurance v. Thompson Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Blue Tee Corp. v. CDI Contractors, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- Western Metal Lath v. Acoustical & Construction Supply, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.