Legal Opinion

Buhalis v. Trinity Continuing Care Services

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 2012No. Docket Nos. 296535 and 300163PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaad, J.

I. NATURE OF THE CASE

Under Michigan law, a premises possessor generally owes no duty to an invitee to warn of or protect from open and obvious dangers, such as ice and snow, absent special aspects. We hold that, for the reasons set forth below, the icy condition that plaintiff encountered was open and obvious. We also hold that, as a matter of law, if a premises possessor provides a clear means of ingress and egress and an invitee strays off the normal pathway onto an area that is obviously not reserved for that purpose, the landowner has not breached its duty of “reasonable care.” When a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lugo v. Ameritech Corp., Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Riddle v. McLouth Steel Products Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Bertrand v. Alan Ford, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Lash v. City of Traverse CityMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Adams v. AdamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Stephens v. Worden Insurance Agency, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. John Pugno v. Blue Harvest Farms LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Jahnke v. AllenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Lymon v. FreedlandMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. David Finazzo v. Fire Equipment CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API