Legal Opinion
Freddie R. RUSH, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 27, 1984No. 83-2695PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
This case presents the question whether, in order to terminate disability benefits, the Secretary must produce new evidence showing that the claimant’s condition has improved or is not so disabling as previously supposed or that there is some other legitimate reason to re-evaluate the claimant’s right to receive benefits. We answer in the affirmative.
I
Freddie R. Rush is 32 years old and has a twelfth-grade education. Before he became disabled in February 1975, he worked as a service-station attendant and in a poultry plant.
Rush’s medical problems began in early 1975,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Manuel A. Miranda v. Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- John G. Myers v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Juanita M. Patti v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Karen Lambert v. Andrew SaulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Gavin v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Lorraine POLASKI, Et Al., Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Tustin v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Dealy v. HecklerDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.