Valentine v. Read
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PARRILLI, J.
In this case we consider some ramifications of the statutes governing creditors’ claims against a deceased trust settlor, when neither probate nor trust creditor claims proceedings have been instituted. We conclude the statutory scheme protects the interests of creditors and trust beneficiaries, shields the trustee from liability to creditors for making trust distributions, and may be applied in this case without violating the settlor’s intended disposition of her estate.
Peter and Judy Valentine brought an action for breach of a will contract and recovery in quantum meruit…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Kowis v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. JiorasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Oliver v. Board of Trustees of Eisenhower Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. MaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Embree v. EmbreeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Bucholtz v. BelsheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Siegel v. FifeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Chodos v. West Publishing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.