Colorado Carpet Installation, Inc. v. Palermo
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
COYTE, Judge.
Defendants appeal from a judgment entered against them for damages for breach of contract. We reverse.
The evidence revealed that plaintiff and defendants negotiated for plaintiff to furnish and install carpeting and tile in the defendants’ home. Plaintiff submitted several bids to defendants one of which defendant Zuma Palermo orally accepted. Plaintiff then ordered the carpeting and tile from various companies. When the tile arrived, plaintiff delivered it to defendants’ home and left it there until the house was ready for it to be laid. When plaintiff’s employee arrived to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Frances M. Bonebrake, Administratrix De Bonis Non of the Estate of Woodrow B. Simek, Deceased v. Donald Cox and Claude Cox, D/B/A Tamarack BowlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Saliba v. Reed Electric Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1932
3Cited by5 opinions
- Allied Grape Growers v. Bronco Wine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Conopco, Inc. v. McCreadieDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- DeGroft v. Lancaster Silo Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Colorado Carpet Installation, Inc. v. PalermoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Smith v. Union Supply Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1983