Legal Opinion
Smith v. Union Supply Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided December 15, 1983No. 81CA0406PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TURSI, Judge.
The défendants, Union Supply Company and Urethane Foam Applicators, Inc., appeal the judgment of the trial court awarding $13,815.65 to the plaintiffs, B.A. Smith and Wilma S. Smith, d/b/a Basco, and Dor-rington’s, Inc. The defendants’ sole contention on appeal is that the plaintiffs’ action on the contract is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. We disagree and affirm.
The defendants and plaintiffs entered into a contract in July 1971 whereby the defendants agreed to furnish the materials and supply the labor for the installation of a new roof on the plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Grand Island School District 2 v. Celotex Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1979
- Space Leasing Associates v. Atlantic Building Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Colorado Carpet Installation, Inc. v. PalermoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Bigler v. RichardsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- Colorado Carpet Installation, Inc. v. PalermoColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by13 opinions
- Church of the Nativity of Our Lord v. WatPro, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- BMC Industries, Inc. v. Barth Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co. v. PPG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Hersh Companies v. Highline Village AssociatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Marvin Lumber and Cedar Company Marvin Windows of Tennessee, Inc. v. Ppg Industries, Inc., Third Party v. Elf Atochem North America, Inc., Third Party Minnesota, Amicus on Behalf OfCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.