Legal Opinion

Cargill, Inc. v. Canbra Foods, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided February 14, 2007No. 2006-1265, 2006-1302PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JORDAN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Cargill, Incorporated (“Car-gill”) appeals from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon concerning four patents owned by Cargill, namely U.S. Patents No. 5,969,169 (the “'169 patent”), No. 6,201,145 (the “'145 patent”), No. 6,270,828 (the “'828 patent”), and No. 6,680,396 (the “'396 patent”). Upon a motion for summary judgment by Canbra Foods, Ltd., Dow Agrosciences, LLC, and Dow Agrosciences Canada, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”), the district court held that the '828 and '396 patents are invalid because of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
Allen Engineering Corporation v. Bartell Industries, Inc. And Darragh CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
Digital Control v. The Charles MacHine Works (Also Known as Ditchwitch)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

Star Scientific, Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
Praxair, Inc. v. Atmi, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
Symantec Corp. v. Computer Associates International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
Cohesive Technologies, Inc. v. Waters Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
Scanner Technologies Corp. v. Icos Vision Systems Corporation N.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.