Tatum v. Arizona
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
This Court explained in Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. ----, 132 S.Ct. 2455 , 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), that a sentencer is "require[d] ... to take into account how children are different, and how those differences counsel against irrevocably sentencing them to a lifetime in prison." Id., at ----, 132 S.Ct., at 2469 . Children are "constitutionally different from adults for purposes of sentencing" in light of their lack of maturity and under-developed sense of responsibility, their susceptibility to negative influences and outside pressure, *12 and their less well-formed character traits. Id., at…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
3Cited by44 opinions
- Jones v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2017
- State of Arizona v. valencia/healerArizona Supreme Court · 2016
- D. Steilman v. MichaelMontana Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. GarzaNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- Arias v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.