Legal Opinion

D. Steilman v. Michael

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 2017No. DA 16-0328PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION AND ORDER

2Opinion of the Court · SheaJustice Shea

¶1 Derrick Earl Steilman petitions for a writ of habeas corpus. Relying on Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012), and Montgomery v. Louisiana, _ U.S. _, 136 S. Ct. 718 (2016), Steilman argues that his sentence of 110 years imprisonment, without the possibility of parole, for deliberate homicide with the use of a weapon, violates his Eighth Amendment rights because Steilman committed the offense when he was seventeen years old and the sentencing court failed to consider the special circumstances of his youth.

¶2 We address the following issues:

Issue One:…

3Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. ContrerasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Carter, Bowie, McCullough v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  3. State v. LinkOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  4. State v. SlocumbSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2019
  5. State v. W. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API