Legal Opinion

Whitney v. Spratt

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1901No. 3744PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Cowlitz County. — Hon. Abbaham. D. Milleb, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, C. J.

Suit commenced by plaintiffs against defendant to remove a cloud from plaintiff’s title to section 32, township 9.N., range 4 W., in Cowlitz eounty. Only the northeast and the southeast quarters of the section are in controversy upon appeal, plaintiffs having succeeded as to the other half of the section. The defendant answers, alleging that plaintiffs’ claim to the northeast quarter of said section was deraigned through one Henness, who held under patent from the United States, and the southeast quarter was claimed' by plaintiffs through…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Caha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. United States v. BuddSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Guaranty Savings Bank v. BladowSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Cooke v. BlakelyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1897

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brooks v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Fry v. WeyenIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Alford v. HesseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. State v. SchmidtWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Tacoma Oriental S. S. Co. v. TallantDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API