Legal Opinion

Pridgen v. . Long

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 12, 1919PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On 12 February, 1911, John R. Barden, being the owner in fee simple of the tracts of land in controversy, conveyed the same to R. C. Pridgen for the consideration of $2,000, his wife joining in the deed, which was duly recorded on 6 September, 1911; and on 12 February, 1911, R. C. Pridgen reconveyed the same land, by way of mortgage, to John R. Barden to secure ten notes of $200 each due at stated times from 1911 to 1920. This mortgage was registered 9 March, 1911.

On 5 September, 1911, R. C. Pridgen conveyed the same land to J. P. Long, in consideration of $3,000, and the deed was recorded on…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Southern Development Co. v. SilvaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Slaughter's Administrator v. GersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Shappirio v. GoldbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. South Dakota v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Mead v. . BunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1865

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fox v. Southern Appliances, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Peyton v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Sprinkle v. City of ReidsvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. McKnight v. CagleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Fisher v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API