McKnight v. Cagle
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
We must determine two questions which arise on the record before us. First, we must determine whether the trial court erred in denying plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. We hold that it did not. Second, we must determine whether the trial court erred by entering a judgment dismissing all of plaintiff s claims at the close of his evidence. Because we find that the trial court properly resolved one of plaintiffs claims against him, but failed to address the other, we affirm in part and reverse in part, remanding for determination of the unresolved issue.
Plaintiff contends…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- O'Grady v. First Union National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Helms v. ReaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Tise v. . Whitaker-Harvey Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Hawks v. BrindleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matthews v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Greensboro Masonic Temple v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- AAA Valley Gravel, Inc. v. TotaroAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- AAA Valley Gravel, Inc. v. TotaroAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Vernon v. LoweCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002