Fullerton-Krueger Lumber Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds
After suing out the writ of error, No. 152, the Lumber Company obtained a certiorari, No. 179, to review the same judgment. The record plainly discloses that a right under an act of Congress was claimed below and denied. The cause is properly here by certiorari and upon it the issue can be decided. That adequate ground for the writ of error was specially set up below is not clear. It will be dismissed.
On January 24, 1921, the original action was brought in the District Court, Hennepin County, to recover excess freight charges demanded by respondents between November 25, 1912, and September…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shwab v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Chew Heong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Sohn v. WatersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Harvey v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Hopkins v. . Lincoln Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- William Danzer & Co. v. Gulf & Ship Island RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Paraboschi v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- E. S. Parks Shellac Co. v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.