Legal Opinion

Walker v. Speeder MacHinery Corp.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 9, 1932No. 40995PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrimm, J.

On May 17, 1930, there was filed with the Industrial Commissioner an application for arbitration, in which said application the Speeder Machinery Corporation is designated as “employer” and the Continental Casualty Company is designated as “insurance carrier.” It is claimed, in substance, that Charles E. Walker was an employee of the Speeder Machinery Corporation, which Company is engaged in manufacturing machinery and has its principal office and place of business in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and that Walker was employed as a demonstrator and expert repair man, and that he was subject to call to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Pace v. Appanoose CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  2. Griffith v. Cole Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Haddock v. Edgewater Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Fournier's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
  5. Rish v. Iowa Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Shelton v. Standard Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Martin Ex Rel. Martin v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Reddick v. Grand Union Tea Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  5. Alexander Film Company v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API